Ethical Decision Making
CGPSC CSAT ethical decision making: dilemma vs temptation, Nolan principles, conflicts of interest, gifts, pressure and whistleblowing in solved scenarios.
Prerequisites
- Decision-Making Framework and Problem Solving — the values ladder (“law filters, life leads”) is the backbone of this page.
- Administrative Scenarios — the same district setting, now with pressure coming from inside the system.
- Social Legislation and Human Rights — the RTI, Prevention of Corruption and related laws referred to here.
The Hook: The Envelope in the Tender Box
You are a newly posted Chief Executive Officer of a Janpad Panchayat (जनपद पंचायत) in Chhattisgarh, and you sit on the committee that will open bids for constructing a block-level market shed. As the envelopes are listed, you notice one from a firm owned by your brother-in-law. Nobody else in the room knows. His bid may even be the lowest.
You have broken no rule yet. You have taken no money. Yet something is clearly wrong if you simply carry on.
The question this page answers: what makes a decision ethical when no one is watching — and how do you recognise the ethically best option among four that all sound reasonable?
Why it matters for CGPSC: many decision-making items in Prelims Paper II are ethical at heart — a gift, a relative, a pressure call, a colleague’s wrongdoing. The same reasoning is tested in the Interview and underlies the ethics and values material in Mains (see Indian Thinkers for Gandhi and Kautilya on public conduct).
Dilemma or Temptation?
The first step is to name what kind of choice you face.
| Ethical temptation | Ethical dilemma (नैतिक दुविधा) | |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Right vs wrong | Right vs right — two legitimate values clash |
| Example | Accepting a gift from a contractor whose bill is pending | Enforcing a court order vs protecting poor families’ shelter |
| What to do | Reject the wrong option — no balancing is needed | Weigh the values; find an option that honours both as far as the law allows |
The American ethicist Rushworth Kidder (How Good People Make Tough Choices, 1995) described four common “right vs right” paradigms:
| Paradigm | Administrative example |
|---|---|
| Truth vs loyalty | Reporting a friend and colleague who has falsified records |
| Individual vs community | One family’s house on a road-widening alignment that serves thousands |
| Short term vs long term | Spending a budget on immediate relief vs on flood-proofing for the future |
| Justice vs mercy | A rule-breaker who acted out of genuine poverty |
The Values of Public Service
The Nolan principles
The UK’s Committee on Standards in Public Life, chaired by Lord Nolan, set out the Seven Principles of Public Life in 1995. They are widely cited in India, including by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission in its fourth report, Ethics in Governance (2007).
| Principle | Meaning in one line |
|---|---|
| Selflessness | Act solely in the public interest |
| Integrity | Avoid obligations to people who might influence your official work |
| Objectivity | Decide on merit, impartially, on the best evidence |
| Accountability | Answer for your decisions and submit to scrutiny |
| Openness | Act transparently; withhold information only for lawful reasons |
| Honesty | Be truthful |
| Leadership | Live these principles and challenge poor behaviour |
Gandhi’s talisman
When in doubt, Gandhi advised, recall the face of the poorest and weakest person you have seen and ask whether the step you are considering will be of any use to them. In CSAT terms: the option that serves the most vulnerable, within the law, usually wins.
The legal scaffolding
| Law / rule | What it means for a decision |
|---|---|
| Conduct rules — e.g. Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964; All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968; the state has its own equivalent rules | Restrict gifts from people with official dealings, require reporting of certain gifts and assets, bar using position to benefit relatives |
| Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018) | Criminalises bribery; the 2018 amendment made giving a bribe a specific offence and added prior-approval protection (Section 17A) for decisions taken in official functions |
| Right to Information Act, 2005 | Proactive disclosure and citizens’ right to information; since the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 amendment was brought into force in November 2025, Section 8(1)(j) exempts personal information |
| Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014 | A mechanism to receive complaints of corruption or wilful misuse of power by public servants and to protect complainants |
Conflict of Interest
A conflict of interest (हितों का टकराव) arises when a private interest — family, friends, money, future job — could influence, or appear to influence, an official decision.
| Type | Example | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Actual | You are deciding a tender in which your relative has bid | Disclose in writing and recuse (withdraw) from the decision |
| Potential | Your spouse is about to join a firm that may later seek permits from your office | Disclose now; arrange to stay out of those files |
| Perceived | You attend a private dinner hosted by a contractor whose case is pending | Avoid — public trust depends on appearances too |
Five Tests for an Ethical Option
Run a doubtful option through these questions:
graph TD
A[Option under consideration] --> B{Legal? Within rules?}
B -- No --> X[Reject]
B -- Yes --> C{Would I treat any other citizen the same way?}
C -- No --> X
C -- Yes --> D{Comfortable if it appeared on the front page?}
D -- No --> X
D -- Yes --> E{Does it serve the public and the most vulnerable?}
E -- No --> X
E -- Yes --> F{Is it documented and open to scrutiny?}
F -- Yes --> G[Ethically sound option]
F -- No --> H[Record it, then proceed]- Legality test — does it keep the law and the rules?
- Consistency (fairness) test — would I do the same for anyone else in the same position?
- Front-page test — would I be comfortable if it were reported in tomorrow’s newspaper?
- Talisman test — does it help the poorest and weakest affected?
- Record test — can it be written on the file and defended?
Solved Dilemmas
All scenarios are hypothetical practice items written for this site, not real CGPSC questions.
Dilemma 1 — The relative’s bid (conflict of interest)
Situation. The hook above: you find that your brother-in-law’s firm has bid in a tender your committee is evaluating.
(a) Continue on the committee, since you will evaluate all bids honestly (b) Inform the competent authority in writing about the relationship and withdraw from the evaluation of this tender (c) Reject your brother-in-law’s bid on a technicality to avoid any suspicion (d) Ask your brother-in-law to withdraw his bid
Best: (b)
Dilemma 2 — The festive basket (gift)
Situation. As a sub-engineer, on the eve of Diwali you receive a sweets box with a silver coin from a contractor whose final bill is pending with you.
(a) Accept it, since festival gifts are a social custom (b) Accept the sweets but return the coin (c) Politely return the gift with a note, and record the matter as required by the conduct rules (d) Accept it and distribute the sweets among your staff
Best: (c)
Dilemma 3 — The list of names (political pressure)
Situation. As a block officer, you receive a call from an influential local leader asking you to add twenty names to the beneficiary list of a housing scheme. On checking, eight are eligible and twelve are not.
(a) Add all twenty names to maintain good relations (b) Refuse to take any further calls from the leader (c) Politely explain the eligibility criteria, process the eight eligible applications quickly, and inform the leader in writing why the other twelve cannot be included (d) Add the eight eligible names but keep the leader’s request off the record
Best: (c)
Dilemma 4 — The colleague’s fudged register (truth vs loyalty)
Situation. As a block-level supervisor, you discover that a senior colleague — also a close friend — has been inflating attendance in a school’s mid-day meal register, apparently to divert grain.
(a) Ignore it out of loyalty to a friend (b) Warn him privately and let the matter rest if he stops (c) Verify the records discreetly and report the facts to the competent authority through the proper channel (d) Share the documents with a journalist so that the public knows
Best: (c)
Dilemma 5 — The missed deadline (justice vs mercy)
Situation. As a district welfare officer, you learn that a tribal student from a remote village missed the online scholarship deadline by one day because the portal was down in her area.
(a) Reject her application, since the deadline is fixed for everyone (b) Enter her application yourself with a back date (c) Check whether the rules or the department permit relaxation for technical failure; with evidence of the outage, move the case to the competent authority and, if allowed, ensure it is processed — and report the outage so that others are covered too (d) Pay her scholarship from your own pocket
Best: (c)
Dilemma 6 — The backdated note (instructions from above)
Situation. Your superior asks you to backdate a file note so that a delayed approval appears to have been given within the time limit before an audit.
(a) Backdate the note, as it is the superior’s instruction and nobody was harmed (b) Politely decline, record the actual dates, and offer to add a note explaining the reasons for the delay (c) Report the superior to the media (d) Agree verbally but quietly not do it
Best: (b)
Memory Tricks
- Nolan’s seven — “SIOAOHL”: “Some Indians Often Ask Officers Honest Leadership” — Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, Leadership.
- Kidder’s four — “TIS-J”: Truth/loyalty, Individual/community, Short/long term, Justice/mercy.
- Conflict of interest — “Disclose, Recuse, Record.”
- Five tests — “Legal, Equal, Front-page, Talisman, File.”
- Temptation or dilemma? “Right vs wrong — just say no; right vs right — find the lawful middle.”
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| Ethical dilemma — right vs right | Ethical temptation — right vs wrong | |
| Recusal — stepping away from one decision | Resignation — leaving the post (disproportionate) | |
| Whistleblowing through lawful channels | Leaking documents to the media as a first step | |
| Compassion within rules (relaxation by the competent authority) | Favouritism — bending rules for one person | |
| Perceived conflict — the appearance of bias | Actual conflict — a real private interest in the decision | |
| Loyalty to the organisation and the public | Loyalty to a person who is doing wrong |
Common Mistakes
Practice
Level 1: Foundation
- Distinguish an ethical dilemma from an ethical temptation in one line.
- Name the seven Nolan principles.
- What three steps should a public servant take on discovering a conflict of interest?
- Which 2018 change to the Prevention of Corruption Act concerns the bribe-giver?
Answers
- A dilemma is right vs right; a temptation is right vs wrong.
- Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, Leadership.
- Disclose, recuse, record.
- Giving a bribe was made a specific offence.
Level 2: Prelims MCQs
All items are original practice questions, not real CGPSC questions.
Q1. You are a member of an interview board for contractual teachers. Among the candidates is your niece. What is the most appropriate course of action?
(a) Interview her like any other candidate and give marks strictly on merit (b) Inform the chairperson in writing and withdraw from the board for her interview, or for the whole process if the rules require (c) Give her slightly lower marks to avoid any suspicion of favour (d) Ask her not to appear in the interview
Answer: (b)
Q2. Consider the following statements about the Seven Principles of Public Life:
- They were set out by the UK’s Committee on Standards in Public Life, chaired by Lord Nolan.
- “Loyalty” and “obedience” are two of the seven principles.
- Objectivity and openness are among the seven principles.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
Q3. Match the situation (List I) with the “right vs right” paradigm (List II) it best illustrates:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Reporting a friend who has falsified records | 1. Individual vs community |
| B. Acquiring one family’s land for a road used by thousands | 2. Short term vs long term |
| C. Spending on immediate relief or on flood-proofing for the future | 3. Justice vs mercy |
| D. Pardoning a poor first-time offender of a minor rule | 4. Truth vs loyalty |
(a) A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3 (b) A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3 (c) A-1, B-4, C-2, D-3 (d) A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
Answer: (a) A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3
Q4. As a Naib Tehsildar, you receive a costly mobile phone as a “birthday gift” from a land dealer whose mutation cases are pending in your court. The best response is:
(a) Keep it, as birthday gifts are personal (b) Return it politely with a written note, and record the matter as required by the conduct rules (c) Keep it and decide his cases strictly on merit (d) Donate it to a school in your name
Answer: (b)
Q5. You find evidence that funds for a rural road were drawn although the work was never done. The officer responsible is senior to you and well connected. The most appropriate action is:
(a) Stay silent, since raising it may harm your career (b) Post the evidence on social media (c) Verify the records and the site, then report the facts in writing to the competent authority or vigilance channel (d) Confront the officer and demand that he return the money
Answer: (c)
Level 3: Speed Drill — Decide in 60 Seconds
Name the best response in one line each.
- A contractor offers to “sponsor” your office’s annual function.
- A friend asks you to share the provisional merit list before it is published.
- Your father asks you to get a relative’s file “moved” in another department.
- A poor vendor’s cart blocks a road during an encroachment drive; he pleads for one day.
- You realise that an order you signed last week was based on a wrong calculation.
Model responses
- Decline — a sponsorship from someone with official dealings creates an obligation.
- Refuse politely — confidential until official publication; equal access for all.
- Decline to intervene; advise that the file will be decided on its merits, and guide him to the proper channel for a status check.
- Clear the road now humanely and, if the rules allow, guide him to a designated vending zone — mercy within the drive’s lawful purpose.
- Correct it at once, inform those affected, and record the correction — honesty and accountability.
Quick Revision Table
| Idea | Fact / Rule |
|---|---|
| Dilemma vs temptation | Dilemma: right vs right; temptation: right vs wrong |
| Kidder (1995) | Truth/loyalty, individual/community, short/long term, justice/mercy |
| Nolan principles (1995) | Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, Leadership |
| 2nd ARC 4th report | Ethics in Governance (2007) |
| Conflict of interest | Actual, potential, perceived — Disclose, Recuse, Record |
| PC Act, 1988 (amended 2018) | Bribe-giving made an offence; Section 17A prior approval |
| Whistle Blowers Protection Act | 2014 |
| RTI Section 8(1)(j) | Exempts personal information (as amended by the DPDP Act, in force from November 2025) |
| Five tests | Legal, Equal, Front-page, Talisman, File |
| Gifts | Not from anyone with official dealings; return politely and record |
Key Takeaways
- Name the choice first: a temptation (right vs wrong) is rejected outright; a dilemma (right vs right) is resolved within the law.
- For a conflict of interest — actual, potential or perceived — disclose, recuse and record.
- Gifts, favours and hospitality from anyone with official dealings are declined courteously and recorded.
- Wrongdoing is reported through lawful channels after verification — not ignored, not leaked first.
- Compassion is shown through the system — relaxation by the competent authority and a fix for everyone similarly placed.
What’s Next
- Decision Making — Quick Revision — the whole chapter on one page.
- Situation-Based Questions — more practice on the interpersonal side of the same paper.
- Social Legislation and Human Rights — RTI, Prevention of Corruption Act and related laws for Mains GS-V.
- Public Administration — accountability and ethics in administration for Mains GS-I.
- Indian Thinkers — Gandhi and Kautilya on the conduct of those who govern.