Chhattisgarh British Rule, Princely States and Zamindaris

Annexation and the Chhattisgarh Division

How Chhattisgarh became British territory after Raghuji III's death (1853), the 1855 handover, the Central Provinces (1861) and the Chhattisgarh division (1862).

10 min read Updated Oct 2026 #doctrine of lapse#central provinces#chhattisgarh division

Prerequisites

The Hook: One District for the Whole Region

Connect

Chhattisgarh has 33 districts (as of 2026). In 1855 the whole plains region was one district, run by one British Deputy Commissioner from Raipur. Over the next fifty years that single charge grew into a division with its own Commissioner, gained and lost territory in the 1905 reshuffle of Bengal, and by 1947 had settled into the three British districts of Raipur, Bilaspur and Durg, surrounded by fourteen princely states.

How did Chhattisgarh pass from the Bhonsles to the British, and how was the “Chhattisgarh division” built and reshaped?

Why it matters: Prelims asks the dates (1853, 1854, 1855, 1861, 1862, 1905, 1906) and the names (Charles Elliot, the first Deputy Commissioner). Mains GS-I asks about the administrative evolution of the region and the roots of its later identity as a unit.


Annexation: From Lapse to Handover (1853–1855)

WhenEvent
11 December 1853Raghuji III (रघुजी तृतीय), Bhonsle Raja of Nagpur, dies without a natural heir. The British Resident, Mansel, takes the administration into his hands the same day
1854Governor-General Lord Dalhousie applies the Doctrine of Lapse (हड़प नीति / व्यपगत का सिद्धांत) and annexes the Nagpur kingdom as the Nagpur Province. Chhattisgarh, part of that kingdom, becomes British territory and is constituted a Deputy Commissionership with headquarters at Raipur
1 February 1855The last Maratha ziledar of Chhattisgarh hands over charge to Charles Elliot, the first Deputy Commissioner (उपायुक्त) of Chhattisgarh
Why 1854 and 1855 both appear
Textbooks give 1854 as the year Chhattisgarh came under direct British rule (the annexation of Nagpur), and 1 February 1855 as the date the British administration actually took charge in Chhattisgarh. Both are correct. Read the question carefully: “annexed” points to 1854; “first Deputy Commissioner took charge” points to 1855.

The first British administration (1855 onwards)

  • The whole of Chhattisgarh was treated as one district under the Deputy Commissioner, who held executive, revenue and judicial powers.
  • Below him, tahsils (तहसील) were created, each under a tahsildar with revenue and limited civil and criminal powers. The first tahsils were Raipur, Dhamtari and Ratanpur. The tahsildar post was filled by Indians.
  • The zamindaris and the larger chiefdoms continued to be held by their chiefs on payment of tribute (see Feudatory States and Zamindaris).
1857 in the new British district
Within three years of annexation the region saw open resistance. Veer Narayan Singh (वीर नारायण सिंह), zamindar of Sonakhan, was executed at Raipur on 10 December 1857 and is remembered as Chhattisgarh’s first martyr of 1857. Details are in 1857 and the Freedom Movement in Chhattisgarh.

The Central Provinces and the Chhattisgarh Division (1861–1862)

  • On 2 November 1861 the British joined the Nagpur Province and the Saugor and Nerbudda Territories to form the Central Provinces (मध्य प्रांत), with Nagpur as capital and a Chief Commissioner at its head.
  • In 1861 the northern part of the old Chhattisgarh district was made a separate Bilaspur district (बिलासपुर ज़िला).
  • In 1862 the Chhattisgarh Division (छत्तीसगढ़ संभाग) was constituted under a Commissioner, with headquarters at Raipur. Its districts were Raipur, Bilaspur and Sambalpur.
graph TD
    A["1854: Nagpur kingdom lapses
Chhattisgarh = one Deputy Commissionership (Raipur)"] --> B["1855: Charles Elliot takes charge"] B --> C["1861: Central Provinces formed
Bilaspur district separated"] C --> D["1862: Chhattisgarh Division
Raipur + Bilaspur + Sambalpur, HQ Raipur"] D --> E["1905: Sambalpur mostly to Bengal
5 Chota Nagpur states join CP"] E --> F["1906: Durg district carved out"] F --> G["1947: Raipur + Bilaspur + Durg
+ 14 feudatory states"]

The 1905 reshuffle

The reconstitution of Bengal in 1905 (the year of the partition of Bengal) redrew the eastern edge of the Central Provinces:

Change (1905)Effect on Chhattisgarh
Most of the Odia-speaking Sambalpur district, with the Odia feudatory states (Bamra, Rairakhol, Sonpur, Patna, Kalahandi), went to the Orissa Division of BengalThe Chhattisgarh division lost Sambalpur
The Chandarpur-Padampur and Malkharoda estates of Sambalpur stayed back and were attached to BilaspurSmall gain for Bilaspur district
Five Hindi-speaking Chota Nagpur states, Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea and Chang Bhakar, were transferred from Bengal to the Central Provinces (October 1905)North Chhattisgarh’s states joined the CP; they are part of the state today

Durg district (1906)

In 1906 a new Durg district (दुर्ग ज़िला) was created from the western part of Raipur district, together with the south-western part of Bilaspur district’s Mungeli tahsil. From then until independence the British-administered Chhattisgarh division had three districts: Raipur, Bilaspur and Durg.

Later changes to the province

YearChange
1903Berar was placed under the administration of the Central Provinces
1933 (1 April)Political control of the Chhattisgarh feudatory states passed from the CP government to the new Eastern States Agency
1936The province was formally named Central Provinces and Berar
1 January 1948The 14 Chhattisgarh princely states merged into CP and Berar
26 January 1950CP and Berar became the state of Madhya Pradesh
1 November 1956The reorganised Madhya Pradesh was formed; Chhattisgarh’s districts remained in it until 2000

Analysis: Why Annex, and What Changed? (Mains)

Why the British annexed Nagpur:

  1. Doctrine of Lapse: Dalhousie refused to recognise succession by adoption in dependent states, and Raghuji III left no natural heir.
  2. Cotton and revenue: the Nagpur territories, especially the cotton tracts, were commercially attractive.
  3. Strategic link: Nagpur sat between Bombay and Bengal; direct control helped later plans for a cross-country railway (realised via Raipur and Bilaspur in the 1880s–1890s).

What changed in Chhattisgarh:

AreaBefore (Bhonsle)After (British)
HeadZiledar / subah answerable to Nagpur RajaDeputy Commissioner, later a Commissioner of the division
UnitsParganas under kamavisdarsDistricts and tahsils under tahsildars
RevenueAnnual, often arbitrary demandsFixed-term settlements with malguzars (from the 1860s)
LawCustomary and personal ruleCodified law, regular courts, police
IdentityPart of the Nagpur kingdomA named British “Chhattisgarh division”, a unit that later fed the statehood idea
The long shadow of the division
The British “Chhattisgarh division” gave the region a fixed administrative identity centred on Raipur. A century later the statehood movement could point to a region that had long been governed as one unit. See Formation of Chhattisgarh.

Memory Tricks

Dates: 53-54-55, then 61-62, then 05-06
  • “Died, Lapsed, Arrived”: Raghuji III died 1853, Nagpur lapsed 1854, Elliot arrived 1 Feb 1855.
  • “Province, then Division”: Central Provinces 1861, Chhattisgarh Division 1862.
  • “Swap, then Split”: 1905 swap (Sambalpur out, five northern states in), 1906 split (Durg out of Raipur).
The five states that came from Bengal: "SUJ-KC"
Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea, Chang Bhakar. All in the north, all from Chota Nagpur, all in 1905.

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
1854: annexation of Nagpur (Chhattisgarh becomes British)1 Feb 1855: Charles Elliot takes charge at Raipur
1861: Central Provinces formed; Bilaspur district separated1862: Chhattisgarh division constituted, HQ Raipur
Deputy Commissioner: head of a district (Elliot, 1855)Commissioner: head of a division (from 1862)
1905: Sambalpur leaves, five Chota Nagpur states join1906: Durg district formed from Raipur
Mansel: Resident at Nagpur in 1853Jenkins: Resident during 1818–1830
Eastern States Agency (1933): political control of the statesChhattisgarh division: the British districts

Common Mistakes

Trap 1: the Chhattisgarh division and the Central Provinces in the same year
The Central Provinces were formed in 1861; the Chhattisgarh division followed in 1862. Options often swap these or make both 1861.
Trap 2: 1905 direction
In 1905 Sambalpur left the Chhattisgarh division (to Bengal), while Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea and Chang Bhakar came in (from Bengal). A statement saying Surguja was transferred to Bengal in 1905 is wrong.
Trap 3: Durg is a British-era district
Durg was created in 1906, under British rule. It is not one of the post-2000 districts and was not a princely state.

Practice

These are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. The first Deputy Commissioner of Chhattisgarh, who took charge on 1 February 1855, was ________.
  2. The Central Provinces were formed in ________ and the Chhattisgarh division in ________.
  3. Durg district was carved out of ________ district in ________.
Answers
  1. Charles Elliot
  2. 1861; 1862
  3. Raipur; 1906

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements:

  1. At its formation in 1862, the Chhattisgarh division consisted of Raipur, Bilaspur and Sambalpur districts.
  2. In 1905 Surguja and Jashpur were transferred from the Central Provinces to Bengal.
  3. The headquarters of the Chhattisgarh division was at Raipur.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer and explanation
(c) 1 and 3 only. Statement 2 reverses the direction: in 1905 Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea and Chang Bhakar moved from Bengal to the Central Provinces. In the same reshuffle most of Sambalpur went the other way, to Bengal.

Q2. Chhattisgarh became British territory as a result of:

(a) The Treaty of Bassein (b) The Doctrine of Lapse (c) The Subsidiary Alliance with the Bhonsles in 1818 (d) The Government of India Act, 1858

Answer and explanation
(b) The Doctrine of Lapse. When Raghuji III died without a natural heir (11 December 1853), Lord Dalhousie annexed the Nagpur kingdom in 1854, and Chhattisgarh with it. The 1818 arrangement made Chhattisgarh a British-run protectorate, not British territory.

Q3. Match List-I (Year) with List-II (Event):

List-IList-II
A. 18551. Durg district formed
B. 18612. First Deputy Commissioner takes charge at Raipur
C. 19063. Chhattisgarh states placed under the Eastern States Agency
D. 19334. Central Provinces formed

(a) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3 (b) A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3 (c) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1 (d) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3

Answer and explanation
(a) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3. Charles Elliot took charge on 1 February 1855; the Central Provinces were formed on 2 November 1861; Durg district was created in 1906; the Eastern States Agency took over political control of the Chhattisgarh states on 1 April 1933.

Q4. Which of the following was not among the first tahsils created by the British in Chhattisgarh after annexation?

(a) Raipur (b) Dhamtari (c) Ratanpur (d) Durg

Answer and explanation
(d) Durg. The first tahsils were Raipur, Dhamtari and Ratanpur. Durg became the centre of a new district only in 1906.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. Trace the administrative evolution of the Chhattisgarh region from the annexation of Nagpur to independence. (150–200 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Chhattisgarh passed under direct British rule when the Nagpur kingdom lapsed after Raghuji III’s death (1853–54).

Body:

  1. 1854–55: the region became one Deputy Commissionership at Raipur; Charles Elliot took charge on 1 February 1855. Tahsils at Raipur, Dhamtari and Ratanpur.
  2. 1861–62: the Central Provinces were formed; Bilaspur district was separated; the Chhattisgarh division (Raipur, Bilaspur, Sambalpur) was set up under a Commissioner at Raipur.
  3. 1905: Sambalpur mostly went to Bengal; the Chota Nagpur states of Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea and Chang Bhakar joined the CP.
  4. 1906: Durg district was carved out; the British division settled at three districts.
  5. Princely belt: feudatory states under sanads; from 1933 under the Eastern States Agency.
  6. Outcome: a stable regional unit centred on Raipur that later underpinned the statehood demand.

Conclusion: British administrative choices drew the map that the state of Chhattisgarh largely inherited.


Quick Revision Table

FactDetail
Raghuji III’s death11 December 1853 (no natural heir)
Annexation1854, Doctrine of Lapse, Lord Dalhousie
First Deputy CommissionerCharles Elliot, took charge 1 February 1855 at Raipur
First tahsilsRaipur, Dhamtari, Ratanpur
Central Provinces2 November 1861, capital Nagpur
Bilaspur district1861
Chhattisgarh division1862, HQ Raipur; Raipur, Bilaspur, Sambalpur
1905Sambalpur mostly to Bengal; Surguja, Udaipur, Jashpur, Korea, Chang Bhakar to CP
Durg district1906, from Raipur
Eastern States Agency1 April 1933
CP and BerarBerar administered from 1903; renamed 1936

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. Chhattisgarh became British territory in 1854 under the Doctrine of Lapse; Charles Elliot took charge as first Deputy Commissioner on 1 February 1855.
  2. The Central Provinces came in 1861; the Chhattisgarh division (HQ Raipur) in 1862.
  3. 1905 swapped Sambalpur (out) for five northern Chota Nagpur states (in); 1906 created Durg.
  4. By 1947 the region was three British districts (Raipur, Bilaspur, Durg) plus 14 princely states.
  5. The division’s identity as one unit, centred on Raipur, later strengthened the case for statehood.

What’s Next

Advertisement