Tribal Revolts of Chhattisgarh (including Bhumkal 1910)
Bastar's tribal revolts from the Halba revolt (1774) to Bhumkal (1910): leaders, causes, years and significance for CGPSC Prelims and Mains.
Prerequisites
- Veer Narayan Singh and 1857: the plains side of resistance in the same century
- Tribes of Chhattisgarh: who the Halba, Gond, Maria, Muria, Dhurwa and Koya are
- British Rule, Princely States and Zamindaris: Bastar as a princely state under the Kakatiya (Chalukya) rulers
The Hook: Chillies, Mango Twigs and a Lump of Earth
In early 1910, villagers across Bastar began passing small bundles from hand to hand: a lump of earth, red chillies, arrows and twigs of mango. Anyone who received one knew what it meant. It was a call to rise. Within days, police posts, forest offices and markets across the princely state were under attack. Bastar calls this the Bhumkal (भूमकाल): the “earthquake”.
The NCERT Class 9 chapter Forest Society and Colonialism tells this story. In Bastar it is not a textbook story: it is remembered in villages as a living tradition of resistance.
Why did Bastar rise again and again between 1774 and 1910, and what made Bhumkal the biggest of these risings?
Why it matters: Prelims loves “match the revolt with its leader and year” and statement questions on Bhumkal. Mains GS-I asks about the causes and character of tribal resistance and its link with forest policy.
The Big Picture: Why Bastar Revolted
Bastar was a large, forested princely state ruled by a Kakatiya line (also called the Chalukya line in some books) from Jagdalpur. Over the 18th and 19th centuries it came first under Maratha and then under British supervision. The revolts had recurring causes:
- Outside interference in tribal customs and self-rule: new officials, diwans and police.
- Forest policy: felling of sal by outside contractors, reservation of forests, bans on shifting cultivation, hunting and collection of forest produce.
- Revenue pressure: higher takoli (tribute), leasing villages to contractors (thekedars), forced labour (begar, बेगार).
- Oppressive local officials: diwans and munshis who were seen as agents of the British.
Revolts at a Glance
| Year(s) | Revolt | Leader | Area | Main cause |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1774–1779 | Halba revolt (हल्बा विद्रोह) | Ajmer Singh, governor of Dongar | Dongar | Succession dispute with Raja Daryav Dev; pressure on Dongar in a famine year; aim of a separate Dongar state |
| 1795 | Bhopalpatnam struggle | Local Gond tribals | Bhopalpatnam, south Bastar | To stop British officer Captain Blunt entering south Bastar |
| 1824–1825 | Paralkot revolt (परलकोट विद्रोह) | Gend Singh (गेंद सिंह), chief of Paralkot | Paralkot (now Kanker district) | Against Maratha and British demands and exploitation; Abujhmaria tribals rose; Gend Singh executed 20 January 1825 |
| 1842–1854 | Tarapur revolt | Diwan Dalganjan Singh | Tarapur | Against higher takoli and outside interference; Dalganjan Singh was replaced by a new diwan |
| 1842–1863 | Meria (Maria) revolt | Hidma Manjhi | Dantewada area | Against forced British intervention to stop the meria (human sacrifice) custom, seen as an attack on tribal religion and self-rule |
| 1856 | Lingagiri revolt | Dhurwa Rao (धुरवा राव), Madia talukdar of Lingagiri | Lingagiri (Bhopalpatnam area) | Against British interference under Raja Bhairam Dev; Dhurwa Rao captured and hanged on 5 March 1856 |
| 1859 | Koi revolt (कोई विद्रोह) | Nangul Dorla, Koi zamindar of Photkel | South Bastar | Against sal-felling contracts given to outsiders (contractors from Hyderabad) |
| 1876 | Muria revolt (मुरिया विद्रोह) | Jhada Sirha (झाड़ा सिरहा) | Jagdalpur area | Against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad; demand that both be removed |
| 1878–1882 | Rani Choris (रानी चो-रिस) revolt | A royal woman of Bastar, remembered as Rani Choris | Bastar | Dispute within the ruling house under Raja Bhairam Dev; often described as a women-led protest |
| 1910 | Bhumkal (भूमकाल) | Gunda Dhur (गुंडाधुर), with Lal Kalendra Singh | Whole of Bastar state | Forest reservation, bans on shifting cultivation and forest use, begar, oppressive officials |
The Koi revolt and the sal tree
The Koi revolt of 1859 is the clearest early link between forest rights and resistance in Bastar. The British gave contracts to outside timber contractors to fell sal. The Koi zamindars of south Bastar, led by Nangul Dorla, refused to allow it. State GK books quote the rebels’ slogan as “one head for every sal tree felled” (एक साल वृक्ष के पीछे एक व्यक्ति का सिर). The contracts were withdrawn, making it one of the few revolts of the period that won its immediate demand.
The Muria revolt and “Muria Raj”
In 1876 the Muria rose against the Raja’s diwan Gopinath Kapardar and munshi Adil Prasad, whom they blamed for heavy exactions. Their single demand was the removal of these two officials. The British intervened, and the episode is remembered as a demand for fair administration rather than for overthrowing the Raja.
Bhumkal, 1910 (भूमकाल विद्रोह)
Leaders and setting
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Meaning | Bhumkal is usually explained as “earthquake” (the land shaking), a word for a general rising |
| State | Princely state of Bastar; ruler Raja Rudra Pratap Deo |
| Main leader | Gunda Dhur (गुंडाधुर), a Dhurwa tribal from village Nethanar (Jagdalpur tehsil) |
| From the royal family | Lal Kalendra Singh (लाल कालेन्द्र सिंह), a member of the royal family and former diwan, and Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar (राजमाता सुवर्ण कुँवर) |
| Planning | Meetings at Tadoki (ताड़ोकी): one at Dussehra, October 1909, and a secret conference in January 1910 |
| Outbreak | Early February 1910. On 7 February 1910 the Raja telegraphed the Chief Commissioner of the Central Provinces for help |
| Signals | Lumps of earth, red chillies, arrows and mango twigs passed from village to village |
| Suppression | Troops brought in from outside Bastar; leaders arrested by about May 1910 |
| Fate of Gunda Dhur | Never captured; he escaped and disappeared from the record |
Causes
- Forest reservation: in 1905 the colonial government proposed to reserve about two-thirds of Bastar’s forests. Shifting cultivation, hunting and the collection of forest produce were to be stopped there.
- Displacement and forced labour: villages inside reserves were to move or work for the forest department without pay (begar).
- Revenue pressure: higher rents; villages leased to contractors who squeezed the cultivators.
- Oppressive officials: a diwan and police seen as agents of the British, plus anger in the royal family at being sidelined.
Course
flowchart LR
A["1905: plan to reserve about 2/3 of the forests"] --> B["Oct 1909: Dussehra meeting at Tadoki"]
B --> C["Jan 1910: secret conference at Tadoki"]
C --> D["Early Feb 1910: rising across Bastar"]
D --> E["7 Feb 1910: Raja telegraphs for help"]
E --> F["Troops from outside crush the rising"]
F --> G["Leaders arrested; Gunda Dhur never caught"]
G --> H["Reservation suspended, area cut to about half"]- Rebels attacked police stations, forest offices, schools, markets and the homes of officials and traders, which they saw as symbols of the new order.
- The small state police could not cope. British troops arrived and put down the rising with harsh measures, including the burning of villages.
- Lal Kalendra Singh and Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar were arrested. Gunda Dhur escaped.
Outcome and significance
- Partial success: according to NCERT’s account, work on reservation was temporarily suspended, and the area to be reserved was reduced to roughly half of what had been planned before 1910.
- Unity across tribes: Dhurwa, Muria, Maria and others acted together across much of the state, unlike the more local earlier revolts.
- Link to forest policy: Bhumkal is one of India’s best-documented revolts against colonial forest laws, alongside other forest protests of the period.
- Memory: Gunda Dhur is a folk hero of Bastar. The rising is commemorated in Bastar as Bhumkal Diwas in February.
Memory Tricks
- Ajmer Singh → Halba (both have an “a” sound up front: Ajmer, Halba)
- Gend Singh → Paralkot ("Gend in the Parallel court")
- Dalganjan → Tarapur (a Diwan of Tarapur)
- Hidma Manjhi → Meria ("Human sacrifice" custom)
- Dhurwa Rao → Lingagiri (1856, hanged before 1857)
- Nangul Dorla → Koi ("No sal for outsiders")
- Jhada Sirha → Muria (against Gopinath)
- Gunda Dhur → Bhumkal (1910)
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| Gend Singh: Paralkot, 1825 | Gunda Dhur: Bhumkal, 1910 | |
| Meria revolt (1842–63): about the meria sacrifice custom | Muria revolt (1876): against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar | |
| Tarapur (1842–54): led by a diwan (Dalganjan Singh) | Muria (1876): against a diwan (Gopinath Kapardar) | |
| Koi (1859): against sal felling by outsiders | Bhumkal (1910): against forest reservation | |
| Lal Kalendra Singh: royal family, Bhumkal | Rudra Pratap Deo: the reigning Raja in 1910, who asked the British for help | |
| Dhurwa Rao: Lingagiri, 1856 | Dhurwa community: Gunda Dhur’s tribe |
Common Mistakes
Practice
These are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.
Level 1: Foundation
- The main tribal leader of the Bhumkal of 1910 was ________ of village Nethanar.
- The Paralkot revolt of 1825 was led by ________.
- The Koi revolt of 1859 was against ________.
Answers
- Gunda Dhur
- Gend Singh
- Contracts given to outsiders to fell sal trees in south Bastar
Level 2: Prelims MCQs
Q1. Consider the following statements about the Bhumkal of 1910:
- Gunda Dhur, its main leader, was captured and hanged at Jagdalpur.
- Planning meetings were held at Tadoki.
- After the revolt, the area proposed for forest reservation was reduced to roughly half.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
Q2. Match List-I (Revolt) with List-II (Leader):
| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| A. Halba revolt | 1. Jhada Sirha |
| B. Paralkot revolt | 2. Ajmer Singh |
| C. Meria revolt | 3. Gend Singh |
| D. Muria revolt | 4. Hidma Manjhi |
(a) A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4 (b) A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1 (c) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1 (d) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1
Answer and explanation
Q3. Arrange the following Bastar revolts in chronological order:
- Koi revolt
- Paralkot revolt
- Muria revolt
- Lingagiri revolt
(a) 2-4-1-3 (b) 2-1-4-3 (c) 4-2-1-3 (d) 2-4-3-1
Answer and explanation
Q4. The Muria revolt of 1876 in Bastar demanded mainly:
(a) Withdrawal of sal-felling contracts (b) Removal of Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad (c) Restoration of Lal Kalendra Singh as diwan (d) Abolition of the meria custom
Answer and explanation
Q5. Which of the following was used as a signal to spread the Bhumkal of 1910?
(a) Chapatis (b) Lumps of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs (c) Lotus flowers (d) Drum beats only
Answer and explanation
Level 3: Mains Answer Writing
Q1. Examine the causes and significance of the Bhumkal of 1910 in Bastar. (150–200 words)
Intro: Bhumkal (1910) was the largest tribal rising in the princely state of Bastar, led by Gunda Dhur of Nethanar.
Causes:
- Plan (1905) to reserve about two-thirds of the forests; bans on shifting cultivation, hunting and forest produce.
- Begar, higher rents and villages leased to contractors.
- Oppressive officials; resentment within the royal family (Lal Kalendra Singh, Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar).
Course: meetings at Tadoki (1909–10); rising from early February 1910; signals of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs; suppression by outside troops.
Significance:
- Pan-tribal unity across Bastar.
- Forced a policy retreat: reservation suspended and the area cut to about half.
- A landmark in the history of resistance to colonial forest laws; Gunda Dhur as a lasting folk hero.
Conclusion: Militarily crushed but politically effective, Bhumkal shows that “jal, jangal, zameen” (water, forest, land) were at the heart of tribal resistance.
Q2. “Tribal revolts in Bastar were as much against the Raja’s officials as against the British.” Discuss with examples. (250 words)
Intro: Bastar was a princely state, so British power reached the tribes largely through the Raja’s diwans, munshis and police.
Against internal authority: Halba revolt (Ajmer Singh vs Raja Daryav Dev, 1774–79); Muria revolt (1876) against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad; Tarapur revolt led by a diwan against higher takoli.
Against British intervention: Bhopalpatnam (1795) against Captain Blunt’s entry; Meria revolt (1842–63) against interference in custom; Koi revolt (1859) against sal contracts; Bhumkal (1910) against forest reservation.
Overlap: officials were seen as agents of the British; the British backed the Raja and supplied troops.
Conclusion: The revolts targeted a single system of control in which local officials and colonial policy were intertwined. Their common thread was defence of tribal autonomy and forest rights.
Quick Revision Table
| Revolt | Year | Leader / key name |
|---|---|---|
| Halba | 1774–79 | Ajmer Singh vs Raja Daryav Dev; Dongar |
| Bhopalpatnam | 1795 | Against Captain Blunt’s entry |
| Paralkot | 1824–25 | Gend Singh; executed 20 Jan 1825 |
| Tarapur | 1842–54 | Diwan Dalganjan Singh |
| Meria (Maria) | 1842–63 | Hidma Manjhi |
| Lingagiri | 1856 | Dhurwa Rao; hanged 5 Mar 1856 |
| Koi | 1859 | Nangul Dorla; against sal felling by outsiders |
| Muria | 1876 | Jhada Sirha; against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar |
| Rani Choris | 1878–82 | Women-led protest within the ruling house |
| Bhumkal | 1910 | Gunda Dhur (Nethanar), Lal Kalendra Singh, Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar; Raja Rudra Pratap Deo |
Key Takeaways
- Bastar saw a chain of revolts from 1774 to 1910, driven by outside interference, revenue pressure and, above all, forest policy.
- Learn the leader pairs: Ajmer Singh (Halba), Gend Singh (Paralkot), Hidma Manjhi (Meria), Dhurwa Rao (Lingagiri), Nangul Dorla (Koi), Jhada Sirha (Muria), Gunda Dhur (Bhumkal).
- Bhumkal (1910): planned at Tadoki; outbreak early February 1910; signals of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs; Gunda Dhur never caught.
- Bhumkal was crushed but cut the planned reserve area to about half.
What’s Next
- Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience in Chhattisgarh: the Gandhian phase
- Jungle Satyagraha: how forest grievances became mass civil disobedience
- Forests, Wildlife, National Parks and Sanctuaries: the forests at the heart of these conflicts
- Social Aspects of Chhattisgarh: tribal society for Mains GS-IV