Chhattisgarh 1857 and the Freedom Movement in Chhattisgarh

Tribal Revolts of Chhattisgarh (including Bhumkal 1910)

Bastar's tribal revolts from the Halba revolt (1774) to Bhumkal (1910): leaders, causes, years and significance for CGPSC Prelims and Mains.

13 min read Updated Oct 2026 #bhumkal#gunda dhur#bastar

Prerequisites

The Hook: Chillies, Mango Twigs and a Lump of Earth

Connect

In early 1910, villagers across Bastar began passing small bundles from hand to hand: a lump of earth, red chillies, arrows and twigs of mango. Anyone who received one knew what it meant. It was a call to rise. Within days, police posts, forest offices and markets across the princely state were under attack. Bastar calls this the Bhumkal (भूमकाल): the “earthquake”.

The NCERT Class 9 chapter Forest Society and Colonialism tells this story. In Bastar it is not a textbook story: it is remembered in villages as a living tradition of resistance.

Why did Bastar rise again and again between 1774 and 1910, and what made Bhumkal the biggest of these risings?

Why it matters: Prelims loves “match the revolt with its leader and year” and statement questions on Bhumkal. Mains GS-I asks about the causes and character of tribal resistance and its link with forest policy.


The Big Picture: Why Bastar Revolted

Bastar was a large, forested princely state ruled by a Kakatiya line (also called the Chalukya line in some books) from Jagdalpur. Over the 18th and 19th centuries it came first under Maratha and then under British supervision. The revolts had recurring causes:

  1. Outside interference in tribal customs and self-rule: new officials, diwans and police.
  2. Forest policy: felling of sal by outside contractors, reservation of forests, bans on shifting cultivation, hunting and collection of forest produce.
  3. Revenue pressure: higher takoli (tribute), leasing villages to contractors (thekedars), forced labour (begar, बेगार).
  4. Oppressive local officials: diwans and munshis who were seen as agents of the British.
Two kinds of conflict
Some revolts were inside the Bastar polity (a governor against the Raja, tribes against a diwan). Others were against British intervention (forest contracts, abolition of customs, forest reservation). Most mixed both: the Raja’s officials and the British were seen as one system.

Revolts at a Glance

Year(s)RevoltLeaderAreaMain cause
1774–1779Halba revolt (हल्बा विद्रोह)Ajmer Singh, governor of DongarDongarSuccession dispute with Raja Daryav Dev; pressure on Dongar in a famine year; aim of a separate Dongar state
1795Bhopalpatnam struggleLocal Gond tribalsBhopalpatnam, south BastarTo stop British officer Captain Blunt entering south Bastar
1824–1825Paralkot revolt (परलकोट विद्रोह)Gend Singh (गेंद सिंह), chief of ParalkotParalkot (now Kanker district)Against Maratha and British demands and exploitation; Abujhmaria tribals rose; Gend Singh executed 20 January 1825
1842–1854Tarapur revoltDiwan Dalganjan SinghTarapurAgainst higher takoli and outside interference; Dalganjan Singh was replaced by a new diwan
1842–1863Meria (Maria) revoltHidma ManjhiDantewada areaAgainst forced British intervention to stop the meria (human sacrifice) custom, seen as an attack on tribal religion and self-rule
1856Lingagiri revoltDhurwa Rao (धुरवा राव), Madia talukdar of LingagiriLingagiri (Bhopalpatnam area)Against British interference under Raja Bhairam Dev; Dhurwa Rao captured and hanged on 5 March 1856
1859Koi revolt (कोई विद्रोह)Nangul Dorla, Koi zamindar of PhotkelSouth BastarAgainst sal-felling contracts given to outsiders (contractors from Hyderabad)
1876Muria revolt (मुरिया विद्रोह)Jhada Sirha (झाड़ा सिरहा)Jagdalpur areaAgainst Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad; demand that both be removed
1878–1882Rani Choris (रानी चो-रिस) revoltA royal woman of Bastar, remembered as Rani ChorisBastarDispute within the ruling house under Raja Bhairam Dev; often described as a women-led protest
1910Bhumkal (भूमकाल)Gunda Dhur (गुंडाधुर), with Lal Kalendra SinghWhole of Bastar stateForest reservation, bans on shifting cultivation and forest use, begar, oppressive officials
A note on dates
Dates of the earlier Bastar revolts come mainly from regional histories and are not always consistent across books. The years in the table are the ones most widely used. Where sources differ, CGPSC options usually differ by much more than a year, so learn the sequence and the leader-revolt pairs first.

The Koi revolt and the sal tree

The Koi revolt of 1859 is the clearest early link between forest rights and resistance in Bastar. The British gave contracts to outside timber contractors to fell sal. The Koi zamindars of south Bastar, led by Nangul Dorla, refused to allow it. State GK books quote the rebels’ slogan as “one head for every sal tree felled” (एक साल वृक्ष के पीछे एक व्यक्ति का सिर). The contracts were withdrawn, making it one of the few revolts of the period that won its immediate demand.

The Muria revolt and “Muria Raj”

In 1876 the Muria rose against the Raja’s diwan Gopinath Kapardar and munshi Adil Prasad, whom they blamed for heavy exactions. Their single demand was the removal of these two officials. The British intervened, and the episode is remembered as a demand for fair administration rather than for overthrowing the Raja.


Bhumkal, 1910 (भूमकाल विद्रोह)

Leaders and setting

FactDetail
MeaningBhumkal is usually explained as “earthquake” (the land shaking), a word for a general rising
StatePrincely state of Bastar; ruler Raja Rudra Pratap Deo
Main leaderGunda Dhur (गुंडाधुर), a Dhurwa tribal from village Nethanar (Jagdalpur tehsil)
From the royal familyLal Kalendra Singh (लाल कालेन्द्र सिंह), a member of the royal family and former diwan, and Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar (राजमाता सुवर्ण कुँवर)
PlanningMeetings at Tadoki (ताड़ोकी): one at Dussehra, October 1909, and a secret conference in January 1910
OutbreakEarly February 1910. On 7 February 1910 the Raja telegraphed the Chief Commissioner of the Central Provinces for help
SignalsLumps of earth, red chillies, arrows and mango twigs passed from village to village
SuppressionTroops brought in from outside Bastar; leaders arrested by about May 1910
Fate of Gunda DhurNever captured; he escaped and disappeared from the record

Causes

  1. Forest reservation: in 1905 the colonial government proposed to reserve about two-thirds of Bastar’s forests. Shifting cultivation, hunting and the collection of forest produce were to be stopped there.
  2. Displacement and forced labour: villages inside reserves were to move or work for the forest department without pay (begar).
  3. Revenue pressure: higher rents; villages leased to contractors who squeezed the cultivators.
  4. Oppressive officials: a diwan and police seen as agents of the British, plus anger in the royal family at being sidelined.

Course

flowchart LR
    A["1905: plan to reserve about 2/3 of the forests"] --> B["Oct 1909: Dussehra meeting at Tadoki"]
    B --> C["Jan 1910: secret conference at Tadoki"]
    C --> D["Early Feb 1910: rising across Bastar"]
    D --> E["7 Feb 1910: Raja telegraphs for help"]
    E --> F["Troops from outside crush the rising"]
    F --> G["Leaders arrested; Gunda Dhur never caught"]
    G --> H["Reservation suspended, area cut to about half"]
  • Rebels attacked police stations, forest offices, schools, markets and the homes of officials and traders, which they saw as symbols of the new order.
  • The small state police could not cope. British troops arrived and put down the rising with harsh measures, including the burning of villages.
  • Lal Kalendra Singh and Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar were arrested. Gunda Dhur escaped.

Outcome and significance

  • Partial success: according to NCERT’s account, work on reservation was temporarily suspended, and the area to be reserved was reduced to roughly half of what had been planned before 1910.
  • Unity across tribes: Dhurwa, Muria, Maria and others acted together across much of the state, unlike the more local earlier revolts.
  • Link to forest policy: Bhumkal is one of India’s best-documented revolts against colonial forest laws, alongside other forest protests of the period.
  • Memory: Gunda Dhur is a folk hero of Bastar. The rising is commemorated in Bastar as Bhumkal Diwas in February.
One line for Mains
Bhumkal (1910) was a pan-Bastar rising against colonial forest reservation and its agents. It was militarily crushed but forced the government to cut the planned reserve area by about half.

Memory Tricks

Sequence mnemonic: Hal-Bho-Par-Tar-Mer-Lin-Koi-Mur-Ran-Bhu
“Halba Bhopal Par Tara Mera, Ling Koi Muria Rani Bhumkal.” Halba (1774) → Bhopalpatnam (1795) → Paralkot (1825) → Tarapur (1842) → Meria (1842) → Lingagiri (1856) → Koi (1859) → Muria (1876) → Rani Choris (1878) → Bhumkal (1910).
Leader pairs
  • Ajmer Singh → Halba (both have an “a” sound up front: Ajmer, Halba)
  • Gend Singh → Paralkot ("Gend in the Parallel court")
  • Dalganjan → Tarapur (a Diwan of Tarapur)
  • Hidma Manjhi → Meria ("Human sacrifice" custom)
  • Dhurwa Rao → Lingagiri (1856, hanged before 1857)
  • Nangul Dorla → Koi ("No sal for outsiders")
  • Jhada Sirha → Muria (against Gopinath)
  • Gunda Dhur → Bhumkal (1910)
Bhumkal signals: E-C-A-M
Earth, Chillies, Arrows, Mango twigs. Remember them as “ECAM: the exam of rebellion”.

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
Gend Singh: Paralkot, 1825Gunda Dhur: Bhumkal, 1910
Meria revolt (1842–63): about the meria sacrifice customMuria revolt (1876): against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar
Tarapur (1842–54): led by a diwan (Dalganjan Singh)Muria (1876): against a diwan (Gopinath Kapardar)
Koi (1859): against sal felling by outsidersBhumkal (1910): against forest reservation
Lal Kalendra Singh: royal family, BhumkalRudra Pratap Deo: the reigning Raja in 1910, who asked the British for help
Dhurwa Rao: Lingagiri, 1856Dhurwa community: Gunda Dhur’s tribe

Common Mistakes

Trap 1: Gunda Dhur was not hanged
Options often say Gunda Dhur was “captured and executed”. He escaped and was never caught. It was Lal Kalendra Singh and Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar who were arrested.
Trap 2: Bhumkal was not a total failure
It was suppressed by force, but the government suspended reservation and cut the reserve area to about half. A statement that “Bhumkal achieved nothing” is wrong.
Trap 3: the Raja was not the leader
Raja Rudra Pratap Deo did not lead Bhumkal. He sent a telegram (7 February 1910) asking for British help. Members of the royal family (Lal Kalendra Singh, the Rajmata) were, however, linked to the planning.
Trap 4: Meria vs Muria
One letter changes the revolt. Meria (Maria) = Hidma Manjhi, 1842–63, about the sacrifice custom. Muria = Jhada Sirha, 1876, against the diwan.

Practice

These are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. The main tribal leader of the Bhumkal of 1910 was ________ of village Nethanar.
  2. The Paralkot revolt of 1825 was led by ________.
  3. The Koi revolt of 1859 was against ________.
Answers
  1. Gunda Dhur
  2. Gend Singh
  3. Contracts given to outsiders to fell sal trees in south Bastar

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements about the Bhumkal of 1910:

  1. Gunda Dhur, its main leader, was captured and hanged at Jagdalpur.
  2. Planning meetings were held at Tadoki.
  3. After the revolt, the area proposed for forest reservation was reduced to roughly half.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer and explanation
(b) 2 and 3 only. Gunda Dhur was never captured, so statement 1 is wrong. Meetings at Tadoki (Dussehra 1909 and January 1910) planned the rising. After its suppression, reservation was temporarily suspended and the area to be reserved was cut to about half of the original plan.

Q2. Match List-I (Revolt) with List-II (Leader):

List-IList-II
A. Halba revolt1. Jhada Sirha
B. Paralkot revolt2. Ajmer Singh
C. Meria revolt3. Gend Singh
D. Muria revolt4. Hidma Manjhi

(a) A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4 (b) A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1 (c) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1 (d) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1

Answer and explanation
(c) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1. Ajmer Singh (Halba, 1774–79), Gend Singh (Paralkot, 1825), Hidma Manjhi (Meria, 1842–63), Jhada Sirha (Muria, 1876).

Q3. Arrange the following Bastar revolts in chronological order:

  1. Koi revolt
  2. Paralkot revolt
  3. Muria revolt
  4. Lingagiri revolt

(a) 2-4-1-3 (b) 2-1-4-3 (c) 4-2-1-3 (d) 2-4-3-1

Answer and explanation
(a) 2-4-1-3. Paralkot (1825) → Lingagiri (1856) → Koi (1859) → Muria (1876).

Q4. The Muria revolt of 1876 in Bastar demanded mainly:

(a) Withdrawal of sal-felling contracts (b) Removal of Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad (c) Restoration of Lal Kalendra Singh as diwan (d) Abolition of the meria custom

Answer and explanation
(b). The Muria under Jhada Sirha demanded the removal of the diwan and the munshi they held responsible for oppression. Option (a) is the Koi revolt (1859); (c) mixes in a Bhumkal-era name; (d) is the opposite of the Meria revolt, which resisted British interference in the custom.

Q5. Which of the following was used as a signal to spread the Bhumkal of 1910?

(a) Chapatis (b) Lumps of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs (c) Lotus flowers (d) Drum beats only

Answer and explanation
(b). Bundles of earth, red chillies, arrows and mango twigs passed from village to village. Chapatis are linked with the 1857 revolt in north India, a favourite distractor.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. Examine the causes and significance of the Bhumkal of 1910 in Bastar. (150–200 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Bhumkal (1910) was the largest tribal rising in the princely state of Bastar, led by Gunda Dhur of Nethanar.

Causes:

  1. Plan (1905) to reserve about two-thirds of the forests; bans on shifting cultivation, hunting and forest produce.
  2. Begar, higher rents and villages leased to contractors.
  3. Oppressive officials; resentment within the royal family (Lal Kalendra Singh, Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar).

Course: meetings at Tadoki (1909–10); rising from early February 1910; signals of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs; suppression by outside troops.

Significance:

  1. Pan-tribal unity across Bastar.
  2. Forced a policy retreat: reservation suspended and the area cut to about half.
  3. A landmark in the history of resistance to colonial forest laws; Gunda Dhur as a lasting folk hero.

Conclusion: Militarily crushed but politically effective, Bhumkal shows that “jal, jangal, zameen” (water, forest, land) were at the heart of tribal resistance.

Q2. “Tribal revolts in Bastar were as much against the Raja’s officials as against the British.” Discuss with examples. (250 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Bastar was a princely state, so British power reached the tribes largely through the Raja’s diwans, munshis and police.

Against internal authority: Halba revolt (Ajmer Singh vs Raja Daryav Dev, 1774–79); Muria revolt (1876) against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar and Munshi Adil Prasad; Tarapur revolt led by a diwan against higher takoli.

Against British intervention: Bhopalpatnam (1795) against Captain Blunt’s entry; Meria revolt (1842–63) against interference in custom; Koi revolt (1859) against sal contracts; Bhumkal (1910) against forest reservation.

Overlap: officials were seen as agents of the British; the British backed the Raja and supplied troops.

Conclusion: The revolts targeted a single system of control in which local officials and colonial policy were intertwined. Their common thread was defence of tribal autonomy and forest rights.


Quick Revision Table

RevoltYearLeader / key name
Halba1774–79Ajmer Singh vs Raja Daryav Dev; Dongar
Bhopalpatnam1795Against Captain Blunt’s entry
Paralkot1824–25Gend Singh; executed 20 Jan 1825
Tarapur1842–54Diwan Dalganjan Singh
Meria (Maria)1842–63Hidma Manjhi
Lingagiri1856Dhurwa Rao; hanged 5 Mar 1856
Koi1859Nangul Dorla; against sal felling by outsiders
Muria1876Jhada Sirha; against Diwan Gopinath Kapardar
Rani Choris1878–82Women-led protest within the ruling house
Bhumkal1910Gunda Dhur (Nethanar), Lal Kalendra Singh, Rajmata Suvarna Kunwar; Raja Rudra Pratap Deo

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. Bastar saw a chain of revolts from 1774 to 1910, driven by outside interference, revenue pressure and, above all, forest policy.
  2. Learn the leader pairs: Ajmer Singh (Halba), Gend Singh (Paralkot), Hidma Manjhi (Meria), Dhurwa Rao (Lingagiri), Nangul Dorla (Koi), Jhada Sirha (Muria), Gunda Dhur (Bhumkal).
  3. Bhumkal (1910): planned at Tadoki; outbreak early February 1910; signals of earth, chillies, arrows and mango twigs; Gunda Dhur never caught.
  4. Bhumkal was crushed but cut the planned reserve area to about half.

What’s Next

Advertisement