Chhattisgarh Kalachuris of Ratanpur and Raipur

The Raipur Branch of the Kalachuris

The Lahuri (junior) Kalachuri branch for CGPSC: Lakshmideva and Singhana, Khalvatika (Khalari), the Raipur and Khalari inscriptions, and the Maratha takeover.

9 min read Updated Oct 2026 #kalachuri#raipur#khalari

Prerequisites

The Hook: The Capital With a Kalachuri Birth Certificate

Connect

Thousands of aspirants come to Raipur every year for coaching. Few know that the city’s earliest dated record is a stone inscription of a Kalachuri king, once fixed into a wall of the old Raipur fort. On the road to Mahasamund, the hill shrine of Khallari Mata (खल्लारी माता) marks Khalari, the first seat of the same line.

How did a junior branch of the Ratanpur kings come to rule the southern plains, and what happened to it?

Why it matters: Prelims asks the branch’s other name (Lahuri shakha), its first capital (Khalvatika / Khalari), the river dividing the two kingdoms and the dated inscriptions. Mains can ask you to compare the two branches.


How the Branch Split

  • In the 14th century a member of the Ratanpur family, Lakshmideva (लक्ष्मीदेव), was sent to govern the southern region from Khalvatika (खल्लवाटिका), the present Khalari in Mahasamund district.
  • His son Singhana (सिंहण) is remembered for winning eighteen garhs (forts) from his enemies. The branch is usually said to have become a separate line in his time.
  • The southern line is called the Lahuri shakha (लहुरी शाखा), “the junior branch”, while Ratanpur is the senior (बड़ी) line.
  • Later rulers moved the seat from Khalari to Raipur (रायपुर).
Who 'founded' the Raipur branch? Books differ
Popular guides name different founders: some say Lakshmideva, some Singhana, and some Keshavdeva (a 15th-century ruler). The inscriptions only tell us that the family traced itself to Lakshmideva and seems to have split after Singhana. In an MCQ, read every option carefully. In Mains, write “the branch emerged in the 14th century from Lakshmideva’s line, after Singhana” and avoid a single “founder”.

Rulers and Inscriptions

RulerWhat we know
Lakshmideva14th century; sent to Khalvatika; ancestor named in the branch’s records
SinghanaSon of Lakshmideva; won 18 garhs; the split is placed after him
Ramachandra (रामचन्द्र)Appears to have ruled from Raipur
Brahmadeva (ब्रह्मदेव)Son of Ramachandra; Raipur stone inscription, Vikram Samvat 1458 (c. 1402 CE)
HaribrahmadevaKhalari stone inscription, Vikram Samvat 1470 (usually given as 1415 CE)
… later rulersThinly documented, 15th–18th centuries
Amar Singh (अमर सिंह)Last ruler; displaced by the Marathas in the 1750s
Notice the calendar switch
The early Ratanpur inscriptions are dated in the Kalachuri (Chedi) era. The Raipur-branch inscriptions of 1402 and 1415 are dated in Vikram Samvat (VS). To convert VS to CE, subtract 56 or 57 (it depends on the month). Guides usually write the two records as 1402 and 1415 CE. Prelims options sometimes give the VS year and the CE year side by side, so know both pairs: 1458 / 1402 and 1470 / 1415.

Who founded Raipur city?

  • Raipur is traditionally said to be named after Ray Brahmadeva, and his 1402 CE inscription from the Raipur fort is the earliest dated record of the city.
  • Other accounts credit his father Ramachandra, who already seems to have ruled from Raipur.
  • Safest statement: Raipur emerged as the seat of the junior Kalachuri branch around the late 14th century, under Ramachandra and Brahmadeva.

Two Kingdoms, One Dynasty: the Shivnath Line

graph TD
    A["Haihaya / Kalachuri kingdom of Chhattisgarh"] --> B["Ratanpur branch: senior line"]
    A --> C["Raipur branch: Lahuri (junior) line"]
    B --> D["18 garhs north of the Shivnath"]
    C --> E["18 garhs south of the Shivnath"]
    D --> F["18 + 18 = 36 garhs: 'Chhattisgarh' in tradition"]
    E --> F
  • By tradition, the Ratanpur kingdom held 18 garhs north of the Shivnath (शिवनाथ) river and the Raipur kingdom 18 garhs south of it.
  • Together these 36 garhs (छत्तीस गढ़) are the popular explanation of the name Chhattisgarh. Treat this as tradition: historians also offer other derivations.
  • The two lines were related and generally acknowledged Ratanpur’s seniority. Each ran its own garh-based administration (see Administration and Revenue).

The End of the Raipur Branch

  • After taking Ratanpur in 1741, the Marathas of Nagpur turned to the south.
  • Amar Singh, the last Raipur ruler, did not resist strongly. The branch was absorbed by the Marathas in the 1750s (dated variously between 1750 and 1757 in different books).
  • Amar Singh’s family survived as minor landholders, but political power passed to the Bhonsles. Bimbaji Bhonsle ruled the whole of Chhattisgarh directly from Ratanpur from 1758.

Comparing the Two Branches

PointRatanpur branchRaipur branch
StatusSenior line (बड़ी शाखा)Junior line, Lahuri shakha
OriginKalingaraja, c. 1000 CELakshmideva’s line, 14th century
CapitalsTummana → RatanpurKhalvatika (Khalari) → Raipur
Territory (tradition)18 garhs north of the Shivnath18 garhs south of the Shivnath
Key recordsAmoda plates (1079), Ratanpur inscription (1114)Raipur inscription (1402), Khalari inscription (1415)
Era usedKalachuri eraVikram Samvat
Last rulerRaghunath Singh (fell 1741)Amar Singh (1750s)

Analysis: Why the Split Matters (Mains)

  1. Administrative logic: a single court at Ratanpur could not easily govern the wide southern plains. A related branch at Khalari and then Raipur was a practical answer.
  2. Seed of a capital: the junior branch turned Raipur into a political centre. That role grew under the Marathas and the British, and Raipur became the state capital in 2000.
  3. Regional identity: the 18 + 18 garh tradition gave the region its popular name and the sense of being one country made of two halves.
  4. Weakness in the end: two lines, both declining, offered no united resistance when the Marathas arrived in the 1740s and 1750s.

Memory Tricks

"Lahuri is Little, Lives south"
Lahuri = the little (junior) branch, which lives south of the Shivnath at Khalari, then Raipur.
Two inscriptions, 13 years apart: "R before K"
Raipur (Brahmadeva) 1402, then Khalari (Haribrahmadeva) 1415. In Vikram Samvat: 1458 and 1470.
Two "last kings"
Ratanpur → Raghunath Singh (1741). Raipur → Amar Singh (1750s).

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
Khalvatika (Khalari): first seat of the Raipur branchTummana (Tuman): first seat of the Ratanpur branch
Raipur inscription of Brahmadeva: VS 1458, c. 1402 CEKhalari inscription of Haribrahmadeva: VS 1470, usually 1415 CE
Raghunath Singh: last of RatanpurAmar Singh: last of Raipur
North of the Shivnath: Ratanpur’s 18 garhsSouth of the Shivnath: Raipur’s 18 garhs
Kalachuri era (early Ratanpur records)Vikram Samvat (Raipur-branch records)

Common Mistakes

Trap 1: the dividing river
The traditional dividing line is the Shivnath, not the Mahanadi. Options will offer Mahanadi, Arpa and Hasdeo.
Trap 2: senior vs junior
“Lahuri” means junior. The Raipur branch is the junior one; Ratanpur is the senior. Statements that reverse this are false.
Trap 3: Khalari is not Kharod
Khalari (Mahasamund district) was a Raipur-branch seat with a 1415 CE inscription. Kharod (near Shivrinarayan) is a temple site with an inscription of Ratanpur’s Ratnadeva III. The names look alike; the places and branches differ.

Practice

These are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. The Raipur branch of the Kalachuris is also called the ________ shakha.
  2. The first seat of the Raipur branch was ________, the present-day ________.
  3. The last ruler of the Raipur branch was ________.
Answers
  1. Lahuri (junior)
  2. Khalvatika; Khalari (Mahasamund district)
  3. Amar Singh

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements about the Raipur branch of the Kalachuris:

  1. It is known as the Lahuri (junior) branch.
  2. Its first seat was at Tummana.
  3. The Raipur stone inscription of Brahmadeva is dated Vikram Samvat 1458.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 2 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer and explanation
(a) 1 and 3 only. Statement 2 is wrong: Tummana (Tuman) was the first capital of the Ratanpur branch under Kalingaraja. The Raipur branch began at Khalvatika (Khalari). The Raipur inscription of Brahmadeva is dated VS 1458, about 1402 CE.

Q2. By tradition, which river divided the 18 garhs of the Ratanpur kingdom from the 18 garhs of the Raipur kingdom?

(a) Mahanadi (b) Arpa (c) Shivnath (d) Hasdeo

Answer and explanation
(c) Shivnath. Ratanpur held the garhs north of the Shivnath and Raipur those south of it, giving 36 garhs in all. This is the popular explanation of the name “Chhattisgarh”, though historians also suggest other derivations.

Q3. Match List-I (Place) with List-II (Kalachuri association):

List-IList-II
A. Tummana1. First seat of the Raipur branch
B. Khalvatika2. Inscription of 1402 CE
C. Raipur3. First capital of the Ratanpur branch
D. Ratanpur4. Capital founded by Ratnadeva I

(a) A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4 (b) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2 (c) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4 (d) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4

Answer and explanation
(d) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4. Tummana was Kalingaraja’s capital. Khalvatika (Khalari) was the first seat of the Raipur branch. Raipur has Brahmadeva’s inscription of 1402 CE. Ratnadeva I founded Ratanpur.

Q4. The Raipur branch of the Kalachuris came to an end when it was absorbed by:

(a) the Mughals under Akbar (b) the Marathas of Nagpur (c) the Gonds of Garha-Mandla (d) the British East India Company

Answer and explanation
(b) the Marathas of Nagpur. After taking Ratanpur in 1741, the Bhonsles absorbed the Raipur branch under Amar Singh in the 1750s. The British arrived in Chhattisgarh only in the early 19th century.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. Compare the Ratanpur and Raipur branches of the Kalachuris. (100 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Both were Haihaya (Kalachuri) lines; Ratanpur was senior and Raipur, the Lahuri shakha, junior.

Body:

  1. Origin: Ratanpur from Kalingaraja (c. 1000 CE); Raipur from Lakshmideva’s line in the 14th century.
  2. Capitals: Tummana → Ratanpur; Khalvatika (Khalari) → Raipur.
  3. Territory: by tradition 18 garhs north and 18 south of the Shivnath.
  4. Records: Amoda plates (1079) and Ratanpur inscription (1114) vs Raipur (1402) and Khalari (1415) inscriptions.
  5. End: Raghunath Singh lost Ratanpur in 1741; Amar Singh’s Raipur fell in the 1750s.

Conclusion: Two branches of one dynasty jointly shaped the 36-garh identity of Chhattisgarh.


Quick Revision Table

FactDetail
Other nameLahuri shakha (junior branch)
Emerged14th century, from Lakshmideva’s line; split placed after Singhana
First seatKhalvatika (Khalari), Mahasamund district
Later seatRaipur
Raipur inscriptionBrahmadeva, VS 1458, c. 1402 CE
Khalari inscriptionHaribrahmadeva, VS 1470, usually 1415 CE
Raipur cityNamed, by tradition, after Ray Brahmadeva; Ramachandra also credited
Dividing riverShivnath: 18 garhs north (Ratanpur), 18 south (Raipur)
Last rulerAmar Singh; absorbed by the Marathas in the 1750s

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. The Raipur (Lahuri) branch emerged in the 14th century from Lakshmideva’s line, first at Khalari, then at Raipur.
  2. Its dated records are the Raipur inscription of Brahmadeva (1402) and the Khalari inscription of Haribrahmadeva (1415), both in Vikram Samvat.
  3. By tradition, 18 garhs north (Ratanpur) and 18 south (Raipur) of the Shivnath made up the 36 garhs of Chhattisgarh.
  4. The last ruler, Amar Singh, lost power to the Marathas in the 1750s.

What’s Next

Advertisement